|
Bundaberg District - Grain in cane |
| Written by National Landcare Program | |
|
This case study comes from a selection of community and industry-driven group projects funded from the Natural Resource Innovations Grants. The range of projects encompasses livestock, cropping, horticulture, fishing and agro-forestry and demonstrate the breadth of National Landcare Programme (NLP) investment. The projects also highlight the range of primary industry groups involved in working to achieve more sustainable use of the country’s natural resource base. These project case studies are intended to inform, encourage, and stimulate community and industry groups into working with the NLP to achieve the goal of more profitable, competitive and sustainable Australian primary industries. Location: Bundaberg, Queensland Region: Burnett Mary Industry: Sugar Group: Bundaberg CANEGROWERS Issue: Soil health, break-cropping and controlled-traffic farming of sugar cane. Key Outcomes
Background Research conducted by the Sugar Yield Decline Joint Venture initiative has demonstrated that “break cropping” (breaking the cane monoculture with a grain legume crop) may increase subsequent cane productivity substantially. This increased productivity is a result of improved soil health. The Sugar Yield Decline Joint Venture findings also demonstrated that the current sugarcane farming system contributes to soil structural degradation through compaction. This is because the current row spacing (1.5m) results in traffic on 90% of the paddock during harvest. The resultant compaction reduces productivity as well as greatly reducing the soil’s ability to capture rainfall through infiltration. The Project Outcomes As well as to this additional production, the increased adoption of soybeans as a fallow crop resulted in a reduction of over 30% in the amount of nitrogen fertiliser used over the whole farm. This reduction in applied chemical nitrogen fertiliser reduces the potential risk of nitrate being washed or leached from the soil, reducing off-site pollution. The growing of a soybean crop during the wet season has further desirable natural resource management (NRM) outcomes by reducing weed problems and reducing sediment and chemical loss from the farm. Weed problems are reduced through the use of different (grass selective) herbicides to those used in sugarcane, and from crop competition provided by the soybeans as they provide a dense canopy that reduces the The adoption of 1.8 m controlled traffic rows reduced the area of compacted soil in the paddock and increased rainfall infiltration, further decreasing nutrient and sediment runoff. The 1.8m row width was selected as it is the width of the cane harvester and the equipment used to haul cane from the paddock. The adoption of minimum-till farming practices reduced the frequency of soil cultivation and thus erosion. The reduction in cultivation increases the amount of stubble and trash on the soil surface decreasing raindrop impact on the soil and the amount of erosion. Growing soybeans improved soil structure, leading to increased rainfall infiltration and irrigation and reduced erosion. The benefit from adopting these practices is that they are complementary and the adoption of one makes it easier to adopt another. Another major benefit from the growing of a legume break crop (soybeans) is the breaking of the cane monoculture and the reduction in pests and diseases that affect cane, improving cane yield and reducing the reliance on chemical control methods.
For more information on the Natural Resource Innovation Grants go to http://www.daff.gov.au/natural-resources/landcare/national-landcare-programme/innovation
|